Description
Ficha Técnica “Create High-Fidelity Designs and Prototypes in Figma”
| Item | Informação |
|---|---|
| Preço | Incluído com Coursera Plus |
| No. de avaliações | 3,280 |
| Nota das avaliações | 4.8 |
| Inscritos | 180,995 |
| Atualizado | Não especificado |
| Exercícios | 26 quizzes |
| Materiais/Vídeos | Não especificado |
| Data | Online |
| Nível/Dificuldade | Iniciante (99%) |
| Público-alvo | Aspirantes a designers UX |
| Objetivo | Prototipagem e design de alta fidelidade com Figma |
| Pré-requisitos | Nenhum |
| Idioma | Inglês |
| Duração | 29 horas (aproximadamente) |
| Oferecido por/Autor | |
| Nome do instrutor | Google Career Certificates |
Análise: Prós e Contras “Create High-Fidelity Designs and Prototypes in Figma”
Prós
- Instrutor experiente e didático.
- Conteúdo abrangente que cobre Figma e aspectos gerais do design UX.
- Instruções Detalhadas: Vários alunos elogiaram a abordagem passo a passo.
- Material Abrangente: Os alunos notaram que o curso cobre uma gama ampla de tópicos relacionados ao design de UX.
- Certificado Compartilhável: A oferta de um certificado por um nome de peso como Google é um ponto forte.
- Flexibilidade de Agenda: O curso permite que você aprenda no seu próprio ritmo.
- Grande foco na aplicação prática, permitindo que os alunos vejam suas ideias ganharem vida.
- Oferece informações atualizadas e está sempre em evolução.
- Aprendizado interativo com exercícios práticos.
Contras
- Avaliação por Pares: Vários estudantes criticaram o sistema de avaliação por pares, alegando que carece de feedback profissional.
- Superficialidade em Tópicos Críticos: Alguns alunos sentiram que o curso poderia aprofundar mais em áreas como teoria das cores e layout eficaz.
- Falta de Suporte na Prototipagem: Alunos sentiram que faltam recursos e instruções mais detalhadas sobre como criar protótipos de alta fidelidade.
- Algumas críticas sobre a apresentação do conteúdo, como a leitura de material ao invés de vídeos explicativos.
- Algumas queixas sobre a velocidade e a complexidade do conteúdo.
- Perguntas de quiz vagas e potencialmente confusas para alguns alunos.
- Falta de uma abordagem mais aprofundada em alguns tópicos.
Análise Geral “Create High-Fidelity Designs and Prototypes in Figma”
O curso é parte do Certificado Profissional de Design de UX do Google e tem como foco ensinar como criar designs de alta fidelidade no Figma. Ao longo das atividades práticas, os alunos aprendem a construir mockups, aplicar elementos e princípios de design visual, e como usar sistemas de design para organizar e padronizar projetos.
Este curso é o quinto de um programa de certificação que o preparará com as habilidades necessárias para se candidatar a empregos de nível básico em design de experiência do usuário (UX). No curso, você aprenderá a criar designs de alta fidelidade, chamados de mockups, no Figma, uma ferramenta de design popular. Você também aprenderá a transformar esses designs em um protótipo interativo que funciona como um produto acabado. Você conduzirá pesquisas para coletar feedback sobre seus designs e fazer melhorias. Por fim, você aprenderá a compartilhar seus designs com equipes de desenvolvimento e destacar seu trabalho em seu portfólio profissional de UX.
O curso é adequado para designers de UX iniciantes que concluíram os quatro cursos anteriores do Google UX Design Certificate. Alternativamente, alunos que não concluíram os cursos anteriores devem ter um forte entendimento do processo de design, como criar designs de baixa fidelidade no papel e no Figma, e como conduzir estudos de usabilidade.
Ao final do curso, você será capaz de:
- Criar mockups e protótipos de alta fidelidade no Figma.
- Definir e aplicar elementos e princípios comuns de design visual.
- Demonstrar como os sistemas de design podem ser usados para organizar, padronizar e aprimorar designs.
- Entender o papel das sessões de crítica de design e feedback durante a iteração em designs.
- Aprender como entregar projetos de design finalizados para equipes de engenharia.
- Conclua designs de aplicativos móveis para incluir em um portfólio profissional de UX.
Os instrutores do curso são designers e pesquisadores de UX atuais do Google, e você completará atividades práticas que simulam cenários de design de UX do mundo real. Alunos que concluírem os sete cursos deste programa de certificação estarão equipados para se candidatar a empregos de nível básico como designers de UX.
Pontos Únicos de Venda
- Certificado do Google: Concluindo o curso, você ganha um certificado de uma das empresas mais respeitadas do mundo.
- Módulo de Quizzes: Os 26 quizzes fornecem um método eficaz de avaliação do aprendizado.
- Portfólio de Projetos: O curso ajuda você a construir um portfólio que pode ser valioso em sua jornada profissional.
Sugestões para Estudos Complementares
- Teoria das Cores: Para complementar a aprendizagem, é útil entender a teoria das cores aplicada ao design.
- Princípios de UX: Aprofundar-se nos princípios de UX pode enriquecer ainda mais sua compreensão do campo.
Instrutor “Create High-Fidelity Designs and Prototypes in Figma”
O curso é ministrado pelos Certificados de Carreira do Google, uma iniciativa educacional da empresa que oferece 319 cursos e já alcançou mais de 7,8 milhões de alunos. A qualidade do ensino é atestada por uma alta pontuação de 4.8, baseada em mais de 1.000 avaliações de instrutores.
Realizações, Números e Destaques
- Top Instructor: Classificado como um dos melhores instrutores na plataforma.
- Grande Alcance: Mais de 7,8 milhões de alunos em diversas disciplinas.
- Alto Grau de Satisfação: 4.8 de avaliação com base em mais de 1.000 avaliações.
Alice Yu –
It’s an amazing feeling to see your design come alive! Figma is a very powerful tool that the prototype updates as you update the design. Sharing the prototype is super easy as well. High Fidelity prototypes is such powerful tool for conducting usability testing and showing collaborators. Loved the attention to detail in this course on transitions as well.
Dmitry Berezhnoy –
Great course on how to take your design from doodles and sketches to prototypes and mockups that you can share with other designers, stakeholders, and engineers.
Jeremy Bauer –
This course is awesome. The videos, readings, and activities are well thought out. I’ve read about some of the concepts and stuff online, but I couldn’t get any of it to really stick before. This course made it a lot more concrete, to where I feel like I finally get it. And now I’ve created a project for my portfolio, which is really cool! It even looks like a real app!
Jackson Bartlett –
Its awesome to see my designs come to life! I’m absolutely loving getting to know Figma and see my hard work turn into something with real structure. This course is well thought out and put togther. I’m stoked to see whats next.
Ravi Sathia –
Working within Figma, you really learn a lot about the program and its benefits. The course teaches you in great detail how to successfully create hifi designs, and is packed with a ton of knowledge.
Hoi Duong –
Getting into the nitty-gritty. Loved this course!
Elliott Awayiga –
Personally since i started my career as a UX designer and taking courses online, this is by far the best structured course i have seen and I love it. It’s engaging and attention grabbing.
Neshith raju –
Amazing content from google, they not only cover figma also they concentrated on UX and other design aspects, Very helpful to build by career. Thank you Coursera & Google.
Kris –
I liked finally creating the hi fidelity version. i did feel like some of the stuff was cut and paste from the other assignments, but maybe that’s by design?
Amrita Shankar –
Good course overall, but in the last section which involves creating a case study and portfolio site, it would have been much more helpful to have a professional/instructor review instead of a peer review, as students are still learning and can’t provide meaningful, actionable feedback in regards to current UX design practices. It would have also been nice to have more direction with building the portfolio site.
Ashfaaq I.I.M –
Hi everyone and the team at Google! Firstly, I would love to show my appreciation to the team for putting out a well structured course for aspiring UX designers and researchers. This first case study has taught me a lot about how design that loves people is design that is loved by people.
However, I would have preferred a professional mentor to have reviewed my final case study as peers do not give critical feedback that can help us improve. I myself felt like when I reviewed other case studies, I would have given critiqued better if I had some experience in mentoring. Coursera and Google, please do the needful here.
Other than that, the course is wonderfully put out and has been a great learning for me. Thank you to the teams at Coursera and Google!
mrs vonpang –
CONS: No instructors. Work is reviewed by strangers on the internet. English literacy is an issue unfortunately. Offering the course in different languages would improve the experience for everyone. There is not a lot of depth to the instruction. You will have to put in a lot of additional research and study outside material. Designing anything out of the ordinary may attract negative feedback.
PROS: Low cost. Good introduction to design concepts for someone with little or no design background. If you are unfamiliar with UI and UX, completing the certificate program might help you gauge whether or not this field is a good option for you.
I am approaching the end of this course but I don’t feel that it’s prepared me to start a career in UX. The program does not deliver what it promises. Although I learned the material presented, and completed all of the assignments and lessons, I did not come out of this course with a presentable portfolio or sufficient entry level skills.
Daphne Macy –
This course covers A LOT. There are some really interesting and important topics in it, and I certainly learned a lot. The instructor was also really great. He explained things very clearly, in a friendly and approachable way.
My biggest issue with this course is that it only touches upon some topics that seem really critical for UX designers to be proficient in – especially if they’re not working in large companies where roles are highly compartmentalized. I felt like it could have delved much deeper into topics such as color theory, effective layout, and more advanced ways of using Figma. I found myself doing lots of reading outside of the course to feel like I had a handle on things, and I’m sure I’ll need to keep doing this. Of course, beginner designers can’t totally be proficient without more experience, but I wish I felt more confident about my high-fidelity design skills after taking this course than I do.
Overall, I enjoyed the instructor, thought the course covered many valuable topics, and learned a lot. But I wonder whether this course has given me sufficient knowledge in creating high-fidelity designs to actually land a job at the completion of this certificate program.
Lyle-Dane Wilson –
Kunal did an absolutely fantastic job with this course and he was gentle to the fact that we are moving to a possibly challenging part of the course so he was clear and precise. Thank you!
S. Fox –
very good info, actually I love it but is way too cramp and way too fast, I have background in Industrial and product design and even for me this is to much, imagine others with no experience whatsoever??
Jeena Jung –
This was the weakest unit thus far in the Google course. I was surprised how little instruction they gave for such an important course. They also didn’t give enough time for the workload. Each of the weeks could have been expanded for multiple weeks. I didn’t learn much about Figma as I wanted to. The only way I was able to complete this course is because of my prior experience with Figma in past courses such as SkillShare and DesignLab.
Lalu Triawanri Novianung –
I think the course is so boring, I don’t get in depth high fidelity course in this course.
Thanakorn –
Too much theory
Edgar Perez –
I enjoyed putting everything so far that I have created and learned into one presentation. Shows the improvement of the app from when it was started to the end and final product. Huge difference.
Joyce Keller –
would be MUCH better with instructor-graded assignments. Peer graded assignments are not good for the more advanced portions of this course. I’ve had to resubmit my assignments to get the grade I know I should have received. It’s like having toddlers grading toddlers on how to drive a car.
Alejandro Taccir –
This class offers very little information on how to build a high fidelity prototype. The online instruction is minimal, or non existent. The estudent is not given resources on how to build the prototype, utilize Figma features. Therefore, the assignment takes an innordinate amount of time for completion. Frankly, literally I’m working on my own without not online support.
P Koukioumi –
Excellent course, could need a bit more mentoring since peer reviews are insufficient.
Maricruz V. Valdez –
This has been an increadible course, you learn a lot about design and the different elements that are important for the user’s experience. If you can take this course straight will be much easier.
Javeria Khanum –
968748
giorgi gegesha –
I would assert that the Google UX course itself exhibits commendable qualities. However, it is imperative to address a significant concern pertaining to the evaluation and assessment of assignments within the course. The method by which students’ assignments are rated warrants reevaluation, as it appears to fall short of delivering a comprehensive and constructive feedback loop.
One pivotal issue lies in the current system’s reliance on peer evaluation, as it entrusts the assessment of assignments to fellow students who may not possess the requisite expertise to provide nuanced and insightful critiques. This approach may inadvertently lead to inaccuracies in the feedback and ratings, thereby diminishing the overall educational experience.
In lieu of this, it is suggested that a more judicious approach be adopted, involving professionals or coaches with expertise in the field of UX. Their involvement could greatly enhance the quality of feedback provided to students, ensuring that assessments are more accurately aligned with the course’s objectives.
Furthermore, the need for dedicated and well-informed evaluators becomes evident when considering the shortcomings of the current system. Incompetent assessors may not be equipped to elucidate the reasons behind their evaluations adequately. Their comments, often lacking in substance, may hinder students’ ability to improve their work effectively.
In conclusion, while the Google UX course itself holds significant merit, there is room for improvement in the assignment evaluation process. A transition towards professional assessment, accompanied by a commitment to providing constructive feedback, would undoubtedly elevate the course’s overall quality and ensure that students receive a more enriching educational experience.